![]() ![]()
A synchronous event effectively runs on the same thread of execution as everything else. Asynchronous eventsĪsynchronous events are much trickier to deal with than their synchronous cousins. #Basic auth. in eventscripts how toWe’ll explore these models in more detail and you’ll see how to apply them in PowerShell. In practice, programs rarely restrict themselves to a single model but instead use different models at different times as appropriate. In other situations, the event service may be an active entity like another thread or process. #Basic auth. in eventscripts codeThis is how the **ForEach-Object and Where-Object cmdlets work: you pass action scriptblocks to the cmdlets and the cmdlets take care of calling your code when it’s needed. NOTE **In practice, we’ve been using this callback pattern all along, not just in GUIs. This model is frequently used in GUI programming. Sometimes this event service is a library routine that the mainline calls and allows this library to handle dispatching events to the callbacks. In this scenario, you are, in effect, turning control over to the event service. Instead, the event source is responsible for initiating actions as required. It never initiates any actions on its own. In contrast, with the eventing pattern, rather than directly initiating actions, the mainline program registers the set of actions with an event source and then goes to sleep. If an action is required, the mainline program directly invokes that action. In the traditional model, the flow of control always belongs to the mainline of the program. Take a look at the traditional flow of control illustrated in the figure. The event service then controls the flow of execution. In event-based programming, the mainline registers a set of callback actions that will be executed when the specified event occurs. In the normal flow of control, the main thread of execution always retains control, calling library routines as needed. ![]() The traditional and event-driven flow control patterns are shown in figure 1.įigure 1 The normal flow of control in a script is compared to the flow in an event-based script. Clearly, inspiration can arrive anywhere. #Basic auth. in eventscripts windowsCrispin Cowan (Linux Security and now Windows Security Guru Extraordinaire) suggested this definition as we were hiking through the Cougar Mountains in Washington. **NOTE **This way of characterizing event-based programming captures the essence of the model perfectly. This pattern is sometimes called inversion of control, but it can be expressed more colorfully as “Don’t call me, I’ll call you.” The key difference between event-based scripting and traditional procedural scripting is that, instead of an activity being executed as a result of an action in the script, a script (or at least a portion of it) is executed as a result of an action by the system. To save 35% on your next purchase use Promotional Code payette22035 when you check out at Asynchronous Event Handling**** In this article based on chapter 20 of Windows PowerShell in Action, Second Edition, author Bruce Payette discusses asynchronous event-handling models in PowerShell. Windows PowerShell in Action, Second Edition Today is part one of two parts from Bruce Payette and Windows PowerShell in Action. She responded enthusiastically and shared five samples that we will post this week. I asked Candace Gillhoolley at Manning Press about posting some sample works from some of the Manning Press library of books. I am really excited about the idea I had for this week, and I hope you will be too. Microsoft Scripting Guy, Ed Wilson, here. Summary: Bruce Payette shows how to use asynchronous event handling in Windows PowerShell. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |